COOPERATION BETWEEN CANADA AND UNESCO IN THE FIELD OF CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE PRESERVATION

Abstract. This article examines the cooperation between Canada and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in the field of cultural and natural heritage preservation. In a world of persistent threats, the risk of destruction of cultural monuments, and global challenges facing natural sites, the protection and promotion of World Heritage have become essential. Canada is no exception in this regard; the country’s active engagement in heritage preservation through its partnership with UNESCO holds a prominent place in its foreign policy. The relevance of this issue underscores the need for further scholarly investigation.

The aim of the article is to analyze the cooperation between Canada and UNESCO regarding the preservation of cultural and natural heritage.

The research methodology is based on the principles of historicism, a systematic approach, and scientific objectivity. The study employs historical-comparative, statistical, and chronological methods.

The scientific novelty lies in the attempt to provide the first systematic analysis of the relationship between Canada and UNESCO concerning the protection of cultural and natural heritage, tracing the stages of cooperation, communication features, and the challenges the country faces in protecting its sites.

Conclusions. The author identifies the key achievements of Canada and UNESCO’s joint efforts to protect heritage sites within the country, as well as the problems affecting the state of preservation of Canadian sites. Significant attention is paid to joint initiatives, specifically the 2008 World Heritage Committee session, which coincided with the 400th anniversary of Quebec City (the historic district of which is inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List). The author emphasizes a unique feature of Canadian sites on the UNESCO list: the predominance of natural sites, which highlights the country’s commitment to preserving and promoting its natural heritage. Finally, the prospects for further cooperation between Canada and UNESCO in the field of preserving the cultural and natural heritage of mankind are outlined, considering the mutual interests of both parties.

Key words: Canada, UNESCO, cultural and natural heritage, sites, preservation.

Submitted: 17.02.2026

Download

References:

1. 14th session of the World Heritage Committee. (n.d.). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/sessions/14COM. [In English].
2. 32nd Session of World Heritage Committee opens in Quebec. (2008, July 3). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/446. [In English].
3. Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of Québec concerning the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (n.d.). https://surl.li/bqpzpe. [In English].
4. Arpin, R., & Bergeron, Y. (2006). Developing a policy on cultural heritage for Quebec. Museum International, LVIII(58), 4/232, 69–75. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000148665. [In English].
5. Canada. (n.d.). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/ca. [In English].
6. Canada and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (n.d.). Government of Canada. https://surl.li/elfwpp. [In English].
7. Canada. Properties inscribed on the World Heritage List. (n.d.). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/ca. [In English].
8. Celebrating 40 years of World Heritage 1972–2012. (n.d.). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/40years. [In English].
9. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. (n.d.). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext. [In English].
10. Historic District of Old Québec. (n.d.). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/300. [In English].
11. Our Priorities. (n.d.). UNESCO | Canadian Commission. https://en.ccunesco.ca/our-priorities. [In English].
12. Parks Canada. (n.d.). Government of Canada. https://parks.canada.ca. [In English].
13. Parks Canada wins conservation award; celebrates 100 years. (2011, May 20). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/752. [In English].
14. Special Issue: Canadian World Heritage. (n.d.). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://surl.lt/kskntr. [In English].
15. Toolkit for Youth Engagement in UNESCO Designated Sites. (2024). UNESCO | Canadian Commission. https://en.ccunesco.ca/networks/world-heritage-sites. [In English].
16. Twenty-seven new sites inscribed. (2008, July 8). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/453. [In English].
17. UNESCO. (n.d.). https://www.unesco.org/en. [In English].
18. UNESCO. (n.d.). Canadian Commission. https://en.ccunesco.ca. [In English].
19. UNESCO Director-General expresses regret over destruction by fire of historical Québec landmark. (2008, April 7). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/426. [In English].
20. UNESCO. (n.d.). Institute for Statistics. https://www.uis.unesco.org/en. [In English].
21. Unprecedented fires fueled by climate change threaten iconic World Heritage forests. (2025, June 24). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/2785. [In English].
22. Young, G. J. (2015). 50 years of UNESCO water programmes: a Canadian perspective. Water, People and Cooperation: 50 Years of Water Programmes for Sustainable Development at UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235002. [In English].
23. Youth Component, 32nd session of the World Heritage Committee. (2008). UNESCO | World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org/en/activities/532. [In English].